engine specs | |
Cylinders | L4 |
Displacement | 1995 cm3 |
Power | 95 KW @ 5600 RPM 129 HP @ 5600 RPM 127 BHP @ 5600 RPM |
Torque | 131 lb-ft @ 4000 RPM 178 Nm @ 4000 RPM |
Fuel System | Mutlipoint Injection |
Fuel | Gasoline |
Fuel capacity | 14.5 gallons (54.9 L) |
transmission specs | |
Drive Type | Front Wheel Drive |
Gearbox | 4-Speed automatic |
brakes specs | |
Front | Ventilated Discs |
Rear | Discs |
tires specs | |
Tire Size | 195/55 R15 |
dimensions | |
Length | 169.1 in (4295 mm) |
Width | 67.9 in (1725 mm) |
Height | 56.9 in (1445 mm) |
Front/rear Track | 58.3/58.3 in (1,481/1,481 mm) |
Wheelbase | 102.4 in (2601 mm) |
Cargo Volume | 8.8 cuFT (249 L) |
fuel economy (nedc) | |
City | 22 mpg US (10.7 L/100Km) |
Highway | 31 mpg US (7.6 L/100Km) |
Similar Cars
RENAULT Clio 5 Doors
RENAULT Clio 1.0L SCe 65 5MT (65 HP)
In Production
1990 - present
HATCHBACK
Gasoline
SKODA Scala
SKODA Scala 1.0L TSI 5MT FWD (75 HP)
In Production
2018 - present
HATCHBACK
Gasoline
CHEVROLET Trax
CHEVROLET Trax 1.2L ECOTEC Turbo 6AT (137 HP)
In Production
2013 - present
HATCHBACK
Gasoline
MERCEDES BENZ A-Klasse
MERCEDES BENZ A-Class 180 (136 HP)
In Production
1997 - present
HATCHBACK
Gasoline
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer 218i 7AT (136 HP)
In Production
2014 - present
HATCHBACK
Gasoline
FIAT 500 Abarth
FIAT F595 Abarth 1.4L T-Jet 6MT (165 HP)
In Production
2008 - present
HATCHBACK
Gasoline
Let's Compare
SUZUKI Reno 2.0L 4AT (127 HP)
vs
RENAULT Clio 1.0L SCe 65 5MT (65 HP)
SUZUKI Reno 2.0L 4AT (127 HP)
vs
SKODA Scala 1.0L TSI 5MT FWD (75 HP)
SUZUKI Reno 2.0L 4AT (127 HP)
vs
CHEVROLET Trax 1.2L ECOTEC Turbo 6AT (137 HP)
SUZUKI Reno 2.0L 4AT (127 HP)
vs
MERCEDES BENZ A-Class 180 (136 HP)
SUZUKI Reno 2.0L 4AT (127 HP)
vs
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer 218i 7AT (136 HP)
SUZUKI Reno 2.0L 4AT (127 HP)
vs
FIAT F595 Abarth 1.4L T-Jet 6MT (165 HP)